theanticlimactic:

theanticlimactic:

I made more things^^

I think the last one is the most important one♥♥♥

This has so many notes and it makes me so happy 💖💖💖

kenway:

uzujusttoodamnfresh:

tiny-green-box:

kenway:

the southern US genuinely scares me like my map of ‘states i will willingly go to for college’ looks more or less like

image

if you’re coming to the us this is a good travel guide fyi <3

thats pretty ignorant tbh 

so are the racist and prejudiced people who live in those areas

there are racist people living everywhere

i live in northern illinois and there are skinheads in my town homeschooling their children and raising them to believe that whites are the supreme race

cosmo-nautilus:

ipodiphoneirack:

colby-wrong:

real-justice-waluigi:

charismatic-thrills:

brett-caton:

miskatonicember:

This came up on my Facebook feed. I would not have pegged Time Magazine as being one to whine about how men are being excluded. Yes, we know men have problems too, but we’re trying to have our own conversation, we don’t need it derailed.
Edit: Here’s the link to the actual article. I only skimmed it but it made me twitch. http://time.com/3432838/emma-watson-feminism-men-women/ 

Feminist: “Why are we talking about men?! Stahp!1!!”Emma: I have no idea why people think Feminists don’t care about men! It’s so odd!

atleast Time magazine journalist have some sense instead of hoping on the feminist bandwagon

Thank god. I was honestly getting tired of all this feminist apologist nonsense. Though I guess a lot of people don’t know much about the evils feminism has done, so be sure to go to
aaasources
so you can spread the info.

OMFG!!
My jaw literally dropped reading this. 
I cannot believe Time ran this.
The way she cuts to the meat of the matter in this article just blew me away:

Men must, indeed, “feel welcome to participate in the conversation” about gender issues. But very few will do so if that “conversation” amounts to being told to “shut up and listen” while women talk about the horrible things men do to women, and being labeled a misogynist for daring to point out that bad things happen to men too and that women are not always innocent victims in gender conflicts. 

#YesAllWomen hastag, anyone?

A real conversation must let men talk not only about feminist-approved topics such as gender stereotypes that keep them from expressing their feelings, but about more controversial concerns: wrongful accusations of rape;

Omg, she said it….

sexual harassment policies that selectively penalize men for innocuous banter;

Omg, she fucking said it….

lack of options to avoid unwanted parenthood once conception has occurred.

Oh my FUCKING god, she FUCKING said it!!!

Such a conversation would also acknowledge that pressures on men to be successful come not only from “the patriarchy” but, often, from women as well. And it would include an honest discussion of parenthood, including many women’s reluctance to give up or share the primary caregiver role.

I’m still amazed at this…
…maybe even a little hopeful?
A world without feminist bullshit where the the issues she listed are actually addressed would actually be a great world to live in.

ALL HAIL CATHY YOUNG

I am smiling out of true happiness for the first time in a long time. Thank you, Cathy Young. A modern journalist that recognizes that yes, men face great barriers too in the pursuit of equality.

cosmo-nautilus:

ipodiphoneirack:

colby-wrong:

real-justice-waluigi:

charismatic-thrills:

brett-caton:

miskatonicember:

This came up on my Facebook feed. I would not have pegged Time Magazine as being one to whine about how men are being excluded. Yes, we know men have problems too, but we’re trying to have our own conversation, we don’t need it derailed.

Edit: Here’s the link to the actual article. I only skimmed it but it made me twitch. http://time.com/3432838/emma-watson-feminism-men-women/ 

Feminist: “Why are we talking about men?! Stahp!1!!”

Emma: I have no idea why people think Feminists don’t care about men! It’s so odd!

atleast Time magazine journalist have some sense instead of hoping on the feminist bandwagon

Thank god. I was honestly getting tired of all this feminist apologist nonsense. Though I guess a lot of people don’t know much about the evils feminism has done, so be sure to go to
aaasources
so you can spread the info.

OMFG!!

My jaw literally dropped reading this. 

I cannot believe Time ran this.

The way she cuts to the meat of the matter in this article just blew me away:

Men must, indeed, “feel welcome to participate in the conversation” about gender issues. But very few will do so if that “conversation” amounts to being told to “shut up and listen” while women talk about the horrible things men do to women, and being labeled a misogynist for daring to point out that bad things happen to men too and that women are not always innocent victims in gender conflicts.

#YesAllWomen hastag, anyone?

A real conversation must let men talk not only about feminist-approved topics such as gender stereotypes that keep them from expressing their feelings, but about more controversial concerns: wrongful accusations of rape;

Omg, she said it….

sexual harassment policies that selectively penalize men for innocuous banter;

Omg, she fucking said it….

lack of options to avoid unwanted parenthood once conception has occurred.

Oh my FUCKING god, she FUCKING said it!!!

Such a conversation would also acknowledge that pressures on men to be successful come not only from “the patriarchy” but, often, from women as well. And it would include an honest discussion of parenthood, including many women’s reluctance to give up or share the primary caregiver role.

I’m still amazed at this…

…maybe even a little hopeful?

A world without feminist bullshit where the the issues she listed are actually addressed would actually be a great world to live in.

ALL HAIL CATHY YOUNG

I am smiling out of true happiness for the first time in a long time. Thank you, Cathy Young. A modern journalist that recognizes that yes, men face great barriers too in the pursuit of equality.

princess-sassy-bottom said: idek its not like im anyone who knows you or anything just u were like "silly humans" or something along those lines as if you didnt have human emotions or hormones

asddipper:

princess-sassy-bottom:

asddipper:

princess-sassy-bottom:

asddipper:

i dont

then what do u want weed for

bc i like to eat it

???????????????????????????

what do u think i want it for

it affects anandamide receptors? you dont have those? you have the body of a human
im done after this though tbh

a round of applause for Sherlock fuckin Holmes everyone 👏👏👏👏👏
no shit im in a human body so im subjected to all the gross human body functions but that don’t mean I have to have emotions and shit like humans do

i’m pretty sure you’re human

most non-human life forms aren’t sentient

policygal:

Preach. 

policygal:

Preach. 

(Source: pitatruckwife)

Anonymous said: Your comparison of men to black people in that "gradually prove" post isn't right. If anything, it's racist to make the comparison. The only reason the black crime stereotype holds up is socio-economically. Statistically though, men in ANY bracket on the economic ladder can be sexist because sexism transcends the stereotypes of race. In other words, what you basically said is, "Not all men." You've become one of those guys. And frankly, your response is bullshit.

whythatsbullshit:

isaucie:

whythatsbullshit:

I don’t understand how distrusting men because some men are rapists is different than distrusting black people because some black people are criminals. I’m not trying to be snarky, I just genuinely do not get it.

I am perfectly willing to try to understand. It’s something that’s always bothered me. Do racism and sexism come from completely separate sources? Are they perpetuated by completely different ideas? Because they both seem to be the same kind of ignorance: the suggestion that one race is inherently better than another sounds pretty similar to the suggestion that one sex is inherently better than another. Are those sources and the problems they create so different that it is completely okay to say “I don’t like men” but completely not okay to say “I don’t like black men”? 

I genuinely am interested in the answer to these questions, because I am honestly interested in understanding. No bullshit. So if you have an explanation for me, send it in! I’d love to hear it.

Black people suffer constantly from stereotypes about them. Socially, politically, intellectually, economically, and mortally.

I don’t see that that is true of men. Sporadically? Sure thing. Systemically? No.

But then your argument is not “don’t stereotype people because stereotyping is wrong”, it’s “stereotype some people as long as the stereotypes aren’t that bad”. 

Or maybe your argument is “don’t stereotype people who aren’t well off”. You’d be absolutely correct in saying that the average black person has it way worse than the average white person in this country. But what about an Asian-American? They’re among the most successful people in America; is it okay to stereotype them, but not okay to stereotype black people or latino people because the latter demographics have it worse?

Or maybe your argument is “don’t stereotype people who aren’t in power”. I will definitely agree that white people have most of the power in this country…but not all of it. Is it okay to stereotype Obama? He’s doing pretty damn well for himself, leader of the free world and all…would it be okay to stereotype him? If Clinton becomes president, would it be okay to stereotype her? 

Or maybe your argument is “don’t stereotype people who have had a tougher history”. Does that mean that stereotyping those who are underprivileged today will become okay as soon as they get a little privilege for themselves? If we create a perfectly equal society (let your imagination run wild), will it be okay to stereotype everyone? Or no one? 

Is it really acceptible to distrust a black man for being a man but not for being black? What if the particular stereotype in question is specifically about black men? Is it okay because it’s a “man” stereotype or not okay because it’s a “black” stereotype? 

My point with all of this (I swear I have one) is that discrimination gets really confusing if you make some of it okay but some of not not okay. And it gets even more confusing if you can sometimes discriminate and also claim the moral high ground. If I saw more posts like “yeah I discriminate, I know you don’t like it and I know it makes me evil, but fuck it, I’m going to do it anyway because I feel that it is a necessary evil, and here is why” I would honestly be proud. But I never see that.

poppypicklesticks:

onlyblackgirl:

The history of film in one scene

"This film is looking a little too Japanese."

"It’s set in Heian era Japan."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

"This film is looking a little too white."

"It’s set in prehistoric France during the time of the Cro-Magnons."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

"This film is looking a little too Latin."

"It’s set in Tenochtitlan."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

"This film is looking a little too Indian."

"It’s set in 8th century Varinasi."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

"This film is looking a little too Chinese."

"It’s set in Qing dynasty China."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

(Source: frankoceanvevo)

thefeministfix:

lacigreen:

WHY ISN’T THIS THE LAW ALREADY ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND ALSO THE WORLD

West coast, best coast!


This law is stupid as fuck, do more research on it before you praise itThe law requires that each advance of sexual behavior requires some express form of consent, and barely (if at all) factors in body languageWhich means at any point, either party can say &#8220;oh yeah I never EXPRESSLY agreed to that so it was RAPE!&#8221;California needs to get its shit together

thefeministfix:

lacigreen:

WHY ISN’T THIS THE LAW ALREADY ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND ALSO THE WORLD

West coast, best coast!

This law is stupid as fuck, do more research on it before you praise it
The law requires that each advance of sexual behavior requires some express form of consent, and barely (if at all) factors in body language
Which means at any point, either party can say “oh yeah I never EXPRESSLY agreed to that so it was RAPE!”
California needs to get its shit together

mynameisianandimaminorthreat:

oscob:

Just a person you either do or don’t want to know. Either way, I don’t give a fuck. Love me, hate me, whatever you do, don’t tell me about it because your shit is honestly way below my list of things “Weston Gives A Shit About”.I am a Devil’s Advocate, so don’t expect me to coddle your side. I’m a Raging Anti-Feminist - Tumblr user ikazed

image

image

It’s literally always dudes that look like this. Really grossly overweight and awkward wearing dumb video game related clothing

Nice generalities, friend :-)
There are a lot of people that consider themselves anti-feminist. It’d be great if silly people such as yourself didn’t generalize an entire demographic of people :-)